Write to Learn: How Authorship Can Forge Expertise

Photo by Hayley Murray on Unsplash

Conventional wisdom suggests that one must first be an expert before one can write authoritatively on a subject. It’s a version of the tally poppy syndrome or being told by your peers that you shouldn’t talk out of your behind. Although there is merit to this conventional wisdom, it is fascinating to watch that those we admire and seek information from do not comply with the conventional.

However, embracing a reverse approach — writing to learn — can not only deepen one’s understanding of a topic but also pave the way to becoming a thought leader. This method leverages the act of writing as a tool for clarifying thoughts, exploring new ideas, and solidifying knowledge, ultimately contributing to one’s expertise in any given field.

The Misconception of Pre-Expertise

I don’t know about you but I was always taught in school to think about a topic, then read about it to begin to formulate your opinions and questions to further your understanding on the topic. Only then would I even consider writing about it but only in the form of notes and maybe extend to essays that would argue for or against the thesis presented. At no point would I be writing as an authority but more so as a critic of the work.